Evidence: relevance
Library edition words from Federal Rules of Evidence
Rules 401 to 403: what makes evidence relevant, and when the court may keep it out anyway.
Either way you get your own copy to change, add to and share.
- Words from
- Federal Rules of Evidence (as amended to Dec. 1, 2024). Enacted law, free to use.
- Edition
- Federal Rules of Evidence, as amended to Dec. 1, 2024 (House Judiciary Committee print)
- Checked
- Word for word against the source, on 17 October 2026.
- How it was made
- Each card is a rule’s own words, under its number and heading; a list becomes the card’s items.Words split across lines are joined, an item’s closing “; and” is dropped, and the print’s two single quotation marks are set as one double mark.
- Edited by
- Aheadso chose the cards and set them out.Every word on them is the source’s.
- On the shelf
- Law, Evidence · 6 cards · 3 topics
The cards
- FRE 401Test for Relevant Evidence
- FRE 401: Evidence is relevant if
- 1it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence
- 2the fact is of consequence in determining the action
- FRE 402General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence
- FRE 402: Relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise
- 1the United States Constitution
- 2a federal statute
- 3these rules
- 4other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court
- FRE 403Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons
- FRE 403: The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following
- 1unfair prejudice
- 2confusing the issues
- 3misleading the jury
- 4undue delay
- 5wasting time
- 6needlessly presenting cumulative evidence
Corrections
No corrections yet.
Every card here is copied word for word from its source.None of it is written by AI.